IJN BB shells less so, Amagi upholds that tradition.ģ. Tier VIII+ USN BB shells tend to be floaty. However, both 16" gun ships, in terms of firepower, is better with Amagi.Ģ. Main Battery Firepower (Amagi): I will never deny NC's damage slamming potential. However, NC with CE + Concealment Upgrade + Concealment Camo goes down to 11.8km. NC's is too short.Ĭoncealment (NC): I don't have an Amagi setup for concealment, but IJN BBs tend to be lackluster in that regard. IJN BB secondaries range > USN BB secondaries range. Secondary Battery (Amagi): Amagi, hands down. Handling (Draw): Amagi is faster but NC turns better, both characteristics are excellent in their own ways.Īnti-Aircraft (NC): NC all the way, always has been. However, Amagi has always had a very, very generous angled profile while presenting her full main battery. Presenting Full Main Battery (Advantage Amagi): The issue of bringing the 3rd turret to bear for NC has lessened a large degree. Granted, the same will happen to an Amagi, but again, both ships will fold fast if blasted from the sides. I've even practically 1-salvoed a full health NC on the sides with Fuso's 356mm. Side Protection (Draw): Both ships are quite vulnerable on the sides. However, an angled Amagi is itself very tough. Bow On Toughness (Draw): NC is very tough bow on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |